Skip to main content

If someone "steals" your partner, here's who's at fault

Is it possible for someone to pilfer your partner from you?

The answer is no.

No one is forcing your partner to leave you. His or her decision to bolt into the arms of someone else is a conscious move on their part. 

Even if the other man or woman deliberately tried to woo your partner with their bulging muscles or feminine wiles, the latter is still at fault for falling into temptation and decimating your trust. 

Being seduced is no excuse for cheating on one's partner. 

If one feels drawn to someone else -- whether physically, emotionally, or both-- they have two options before going down the slippery slope of infidelity:

1. Telling that person to back off and having a serious conversation with their partner in an effort to rekindle attraction and closeness.  

2. Ending the relationship before commencing a new one with the other man or woman. 

At least, that would be the mature, thoughtful way to handle the situation.

But those who are thinking only with their privates -- and who are insensitive to their partner's feelings -- will proceed to cheat on them. 

Wanting the cake and wanting to eat it too is selfish and despicable. But I firmly believe that what comes around goes around, and the cheater is often the one who winds up miserable in the end. 

Karma has a way of balancing things out in an evenhanded fashion. 

Perhaps the cheater gets a taste of his own medicine by being cheated on himself. 

Or perhaps they come to realize too late that they made a mistake, and there's no going back.

If someone "steals" your significant other, consider it a blessing. 

Tell the other man or woman that they can keep your ex because you've realized you deserve better -- that a person worth being with would never stoop so low. 

If someone is going to cheat, the least they can do is have enough class to own up to it rather than place the blame squarely on the shoulders of a third party. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is  still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n...

Women vs. Men: Who likes to backstab more?

Whether it's on TV or in the workplace, the general consensus seems to be that women gossip, backstab, and stir up more conflict than men do. But, as with every other topic, I thought it only fair to put this so-called stereotype under the microscope. If you watch reality shows like Celebrity Apprentice, you'll notice it's the women who spend far more time bickering. While the men do at times become embroiled in tit for tat, it's the women who are portrayed as meaner and more hostile. In the workplace, I have noticed that women seem to gossip far more than their male counterparts. I haven't really seen any cases where a person blatantly backstabs the other, but I have caught both men and women in little white lies. If it is true that women are generally more into backstabbing and gossiping than men, why is this the case? I believe that it isn't fair to make a blanket statement like "all women play these games while all men keep to themselves and pre...