Skip to main content

Why getting mad at people is pointless

You're probably thinking, "This guy has lost his mind. Why in the world would getting mad at people be pointless?"

Fair question. Of course, there are situations where being mad at people is justified: The guy who stole your car, the customer service rep who accidentally billed you $500 more than she should have, the employer who failed to let you know they'd decided to go with a different candidate for the position you'd set your sights on. 

But let's face it: sometimes we get mad at friends or relatives over the most trivial matters. We let our emotions get the best of us, an argument ensues, and one or both of us is left reeling. You may not talk to each other for a while, if ever again. 

What many people fail to realize is that people are powerless unless we react react to their behavior. 

By showing you're mad, you're essentially conveying that you care -- at least enough to get your emotions involved.

Eleanor Roosevelt once said, "No one can judge you without your consent." Similarly, no one can upset you without your giving the green light either.

I've said it time and time again: Life isn't really about what happens to us. Instead, it revolves around what we do with what happens to us -- how we react to a given situation and go from there.

You can either let not getting a job destroy you mentally, or you can use the unfortunate outcome to more aggressively go after other opportunities you know will help you thrive professionally. Further, you can get mad at a friend for leaving you hanging, or you can say you won't let yourself get so bothered by it and resolve not to invite her to your next outing until she apologizes or takes the initiative to invite you elsewhere.

Getting angry isn't a constructive way to deal with conflict. If anything, it plays right into the hands of the other person. They'll come to realize that you care enough to get all bent out of shape, so they'll persist in their umbecoming behavior.

A better alternative? Speaking firmly while keeping one's emotions at bay. This demonstrates that while their behavior rubbed you the wrong way, you have far too many things to do (and people to see) to let their actions consume you.

Far more powerful than anger is indifference. Why? Because the person who cares the least in the relationship holds the most power. Chances are they're willing to walk, though the other person is not.

While refraining from ever being upset is impossible, we certainly wield more control over our emotions -- positive and negative -- than we realize. 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Amen!

Popular posts from this blog

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is  still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n...

Women vs. Men: Who likes to backstab more?

Whether it's on TV or in the workplace, the general consensus seems to be that women gossip, backstab, and stir up more conflict than men do. But, as with every other topic, I thought it only fair to put this so-called stereotype under the microscope. If you watch reality shows like Celebrity Apprentice, you'll notice it's the women who spend far more time bickering. While the men do at times become embroiled in tit for tat, it's the women who are portrayed as meaner and more hostile. In the workplace, I have noticed that women seem to gossip far more than their male counterparts. I haven't really seen any cases where a person blatantly backstabs the other, but I have caught both men and women in little white lies. If it is true that women are generally more into backstabbing and gossiping than men, why is this the case? I believe that it isn't fair to make a blanket statement like "all women play these games while all men keep to themselves and pre...