Skip to main content

Many women STILL come off as gold diggers

I recently had a conversation with a lady friend of mine in which she asserted that the next man she dates will have to be rich.

I've also seen comments to Facebook posts in which some women reply with posts like, "it'd be better if he were a millionaire."

It isn't always easy to distinguish between women who are flat-out gold diggers, and those who insist on a rich man only because they themselves dated moochers who took them for all they're worth.

As you've probably noted in many of my posts, I am a big supporter of women's rights, especially when it comes to equal pay and equitable treatment in the workplace.

However, I think women who use men for their money undermine those who genuinely want to work hard to progress in their respective jobs-- the women who aim to show their male bosses that they're deserving of the salaries their male colleagues earn.

Gold diggers come off as lazy and entitled, giving some men more fodder not to commit to anyone. As soon as a man picks up on this, his strategy becomes simple: Wine and dine her for as long as she is willing to put out, then kick her to the curb.

For those women who've chosen to limit themselves to wealthy men because of a bad experience with a moocher, I understand your frustration. But by taking this approach, you're simply stooping to his level. Why should men be held to such standards only because of one rotten egg?

I think it's reasonable to expect that a potential suitor have a steady job and decent income. But to demand that he be a millionaire is, in my view, taking it to an extreme. If you go down this path, you're greatly limiting your possibilities. The right person for you just might be the gregarious lawyer who lives next door and makes a not-too-shabby salary of 100K.

To me, people who deliberately seek rich partners are misguided and plainly in the wrong. Don't try to cut corners, ladies. There's nothing a man respects more than a woman who enjoys working hard for the money!

Thoughts?  Please share them on the blog, or on Google +. And don't miss previous posts, which you can access here: How to Understand People

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

Women vs. Men: Who likes to backstab more?

Whether it's on TV or in the workplace, the general consensus seems to be that women gossip, backstab, and stir up more conflict than men do. But, as with every other topic, I thought it only fair to put this so-called stereotype under the microscope. If you watch reality shows like Celebrity Apprentice, you'll notice it's the women who spend far more time bickering. While the men do at times become embroiled in tit for tat, it's the women who are portrayed as meaner and more hostile. In the workplace, I have noticed that women seem to gossip far more than their male counterparts. I haven't really seen any cases where a person blatantly backstabs the other, but I have caught both men and women in little white lies. If it is true that women are generally more into backstabbing and gossiping than men, why is this the case? I believe that it isn't fair to make a blanket statement like "all women play these games while all men keep to themselves and pre...

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is  still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n...