Skip to main content

Should relationships always be 50/50?

Nobody would argue that relationships are (or should be) about give and take.

If one finds himself constantly giving but never receiving -- be it love, affection, emotional support -- it won't be long before he realizes things are badly lopsided, potentially prompting him to walk unless the other person begins to appreciate him more.

That being said, many people argue that relationships should be 50/50, with each partner investing an equal amount of time and energy.

But should it always be this way?

While I think partners should certainly strive to contribute proportionally, it can't be this way ALL the time.

If someone has had a bad day at work or isn't feeling well, it makes sense for one partner to be noticeably more giving for the time being. Then, when the other person suffers a similar fate, they, too, should receive the same treatment.

Then there are those cases where both individuals suffer together (e.g., grieving the loss of a mutual friend) and act as each other's rock of emotional support.

In other words, it's normal for partners to switch roles -- between comforter and comforted -- depending on what each is confronting in his or her life.

What is completely unacceptable, however, is for one partner to consciously pull away, forcing the other person to keep the relationship afloat on their own.

Whether they've checked out because they're complacent, being unfaithful, or flat-out indifferent, a 90/10 or 100/0 share is tantamount to abuse, and nobody should stand for that.

If someone senses they have too much of the relationship on their shoulders, they should address their feelings openly. If the other person still fails to act, the sun likely has set on this relationship.

Selfishness can shatter a relationship beyond repair. And what epitomizes selfishness like trying to reap all the benefits of the relationship while doing little to nothing to nurture it?

To conclude, if things are, for the most part, going fine for both partners, then yes -- it should be about 50/50. If a relationship is to survive, it should be built on fairness and teamwork.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Women vs. Men: Who likes to backstab more?

Whether it's on TV or in the workplace, the general consensus seems to be that women gossip, backstab, and stir up more conflict than men do. But, as with every other topic, I thought it only fair to put this so-called stereotype under the microscope. If you watch reality shows like Celebrity Apprentice, you'll notice it's the women who spend far more time bickering. While the men do at times become embroiled in tit for tat, it's the women who are portrayed as meaner and more hostile. In the workplace, I have noticed that women seem to gossip far more than their male counterparts. I haven't really seen any cases where a person blatantly backstabs the other, but I have caught both men and women in little white lies. If it is true that women are generally more into backstabbing and gossiping than men, why is this the case? I believe that it isn't fair to make a blanket statement like "all women play these games while all men keep to themselves and pre...

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

Men prefer to marry brunettes

Study after study shows that men prefer blondes as girlfriends or mistresses and brunettes as wives . It seems many men see brunettes as more trustworthy and loyal. What's more, even though participants claimed that blondes are better in bed, they feel brunettes are better kissers and more affectionate than blondes. I find these results to be rather interesting. In my high school and early college days, I actually had a preference for blondes myself -- that is, until I hooked up with my now-wife. From that point on, I deemed brunettes as more attractive and marriage material, probably because they reminded me of and more closely resembled her. I think we can blame Hollywood, shows like Baywatch, and Playboy for painting blondes as wild, big chested, promiscuous and loose. (Yes, I know that there are brunettes in Playboy, but they seem to be in the minority.) When someone tells a man to think of an attractive blonde, who do you think likely crosses his mind? More likely than...