Should relationships always be 50/50?

Nobody would argue that relationships are (or should be) about give and take.

If one finds himself constantly giving but never receiving -- be it love, affection, emotional support -- it won't be long before he realizes things are badly lopsided, potentially prompting him to walk unless the other person begins to appreciate him more.

That being said, many people argue that relationships should be 50/50, with each partner investing an equal amount of time and energy.

But should it always be this way?

While I think partners should certainly strive to contribute proportionally, it can't be this way ALL the time.

If someone has had a bad day at work or isn't feeling well, it makes sense for one partner to be noticeably more giving for the time being. Then, when the other person suffers a similar fate, they, too, should receive the same treatment.

Then there are those cases where both individuals suffer together (e.g., grieving the loss of a mutual friend) and act as each other's rock of emotional support.

In other words, it's normal for partners to switch roles -- between comforter and comforted -- depending on what each is confronting in his or her life.

What is completely unacceptable, however, is for one partner to consciously pull away, forcing the other person to keep the relationship afloat on their own.

Whether they've checked out because they're complacent, being unfaithful, or flat-out indifferent, a 90/10 or 100/0 share is tantamount to abuse, and nobody should stand for that.

If someone senses they have too much of the relationship on their shoulders, they should address their feelings openly. If the other person still fails to act, the sun likely has set on this relationship.

Selfishness can shatter a relationship beyond repair. And what epitomizes selfishness like trying to reap all the benefits of the relationship while doing little to nothing to nurture it?

To conclude, if things are, for the most part, going fine for both partners, then yes -- it should be about 50/50. If a relationship is to survive, it should be built on fairness and teamwork.

Comments

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it? After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n...

An important note to women about men and attraction

I was raised by my mom, grandma, and two older sisters. Growing up, never did I ever take any interest in the girls at school who tended toward exposing more skin. I always treated them as I would my female family members -- with the utmost courtesy and respect. And anytime I suspected that a male friend or acquaintance of mine adopted a hump-and-dump attitude toward women, I nixed them from my life. I held men who treated women as objects in very low regard, and still do to this day. If women feel empowered to show off their bodies because they love and work hard on their physique, more power to them. In other words, if they're doing it to please THEMSELVES and no one else, good for them. However, those who do it specifically to curry men's favor are making a big mistake. It sends the wrong signals and actually makes it less likely that a man will want to stick around for a committed relationship (if that's what you want as anyway). Granted, if you're not lookin...

How To Understand People

Search This Blog