Skip to main content

An unmistakable truth about people

If there's something we could all agree on, it's that there is always going to be something about every individual in our life -- from our partner to our friends to our coworkers -- that we don't necessarily like.

There's always going to be a trait, tendency, or quirk that gets under our skin and that we would probably do away with if given the choice.

Maybe they're a tad cheap. Perhaps they're a bit stuck-up. They could very well be messy, aloof, or prone to lying.

Hopefully, we are able to turn a blind eye to these perceived shortcomings. But for those things that aren't as easy to gloss over, it's up to us to decide what we're willing or not willing to tolerate.

The key question becomes:

At what point does something we perceive as a character flaw in another person become too much to handle?

Let's be fair, though. It isn't as if we're perfect either.

So if we decide to cut ties with someone because of, say, their substance abuse problems, yet we find ourselves battling alcoholism, that comes off as hypocritical.

That's why it's so important to practice what we preach when it comes to relationships.

If the person can't seem to rein in their spending, always coming to you to bail them out, you may decide to pull the plug on the relationship.

And how about cheating? It amazes me that some people find it in their hearts to forgive and take back their cheating partner, only to see them stray yet again!

As I've noted in prior posts, the strongest relationships involve people who accept each other for who they are.

I've stressed that people who don't value -- or who push us into changing -- the most authentic version of ourselves are not worth our time.

Still, if their actions are adversely affecting someone else (e.g., compulsive gambling, bullying, etc.), change is inevitable -- or else they risk seeing that person walk out of their life.

If the discontent stems from less serious matters that are more like annoyances (e.g., they're messy around the house), the person being blamed may say "once a slob, always a slob," effectively ending the relationship and setting out in search of someone similarly untidy.

Usually, it's a matter of desiring that they be more like us in some way. Maybe we wish they were as responsible with their money or as attentive to the kids as we are.

When they diverge too widely from us in some respect, it may cause us to question whether it's something we can put up with indefinitely.

You may remember reading posts in which I warn against expecting people to think and act like us.

If we're lucky, we make our case, the person understands our position, and they immediately start to work on improving themselves.

Unfortunately, though, our request may be met with resistance, ultimately putting the relationship in jeopardy.

If they refuse to take your feelings into account, you're better off without them.

We can't change people, but we can change how we respond to them. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is  still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n...

Women vs. Men: Who likes to backstab more?

Whether it's on TV or in the workplace, the general consensus seems to be that women gossip, backstab, and stir up more conflict than men do. But, as with every other topic, I thought it only fair to put this so-called stereotype under the microscope. If you watch reality shows like Celebrity Apprentice, you'll notice it's the women who spend far more time bickering. While the men do at times become embroiled in tit for tat, it's the women who are portrayed as meaner and more hostile. In the workplace, I have noticed that women seem to gossip far more than their male counterparts. I haven't really seen any cases where a person blatantly backstabs the other, but I have caught both men and women in little white lies. If it is true that women are generally more into backstabbing and gossiping than men, why is this the case? I believe that it isn't fair to make a blanket statement like "all women play these games while all men keep to themselves and pre...