Skip to main content

If you want a happy life, do THIS

The key to a happier life, as Albert Einstein said, is to tie your life to a goal -- not to people or things.

We all have goals we aim to achieve, from getting a degree to traveling around the world to losing weight to spending more time with our family.

When you make your happiness contingent upon the acquisition of material possessions or the approval of others, the quality of your life takes a nosedive.

For one, material stuff rusts, wears, and tears. Sure, it's always nice to get a new phone or car, but the novelty of the item dissipates quite fast. Before you know it, that phone or car is giving you problems. People who feel they have to be the first to obtain the latest and greatest gadgets will never be content, and it's likely because they're trying to stay ahead of their peers. In the end, buying loads of expensive products you may not even need does nothing but eat away at your bank account and credit.

Typing your happiness to other people is similarly pointless. Why? Because there's no guarantee whether the person whose validation you seek will turn their back on your tomorrow or leave your life altogether. Like the seasons, people change -- and not always for the better.

There's no doubt that people and things can enhance your life, but never should your happiness hinge on them.

If you want to find the true source of your happiness, look deep inside yourself. Happiness comes from within.

There's a difference between saying your happiness depends partly on meeting someone whose virtues and interests complement yours, and saying that you will not be happy unless you end up with Joe Schmoe from the grocery store. The former shows you have an actual goal in mind, and that goal doesn't change whether the relationship with a particular person survives. The latter means you are putting all your happiness eggs in the basket of a specific person who might dump you at the drop of a hat.

Moreover, it's not the same to say you strive to get a promotion because rising through the ranks at your company means a lot to you, and saying you won't feel complete unless you're making $100,000 a year because you couldn't live without the most exorbitantly priced items on the market.

When your tie your life to concrete goals, you're at least challenging yourself. You want to grow. The goal pertains only to you. And you're not putting yourself in a mental straitjacket where happiness is unobtainable without external factors (things and people).

You might be asking, "Well, what happens when you can't accomplish the goal? Does that not make the person a failure?" Absolutely not. The only way one fails is by not trying at all. If a person is fully committed to achieving something, nothing or no one can stop them. They may have to tweak the goal or even fine-tune their approach a bit. But they refuse to quit.

Want to be happy? Don't turn to your iPhone. Don't look to your partner, friends, or coworkers. Look in the mirror. 

Comments

Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

Popular posts from this blog

Women vs. Men: Who likes to backstab more?

Whether it's on TV or in the workplace, the general consensus seems to be that women gossip, backstab, and stir up more conflict than men do. But, as with every other topic, I thought it only fair to put this so-called stereotype under the microscope. If you watch reality shows like Celebrity Apprentice, you'll notice it's the women who spend far more time bickering. While the men do at times become embroiled in tit for tat, it's the women who are portrayed as meaner and more hostile. In the workplace, I have noticed that women seem to gossip far more than their male counterparts. I haven't really seen any cases where a person blatantly backstabs the other, but I have caught both men and women in little white lies. If it is true that women are generally more into backstabbing and gossiping than men, why is this the case? I believe that it isn't fair to make a blanket statement like "all women play these games while all men keep to themselves and pre...

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

Men prefer to marry brunettes

Study after study shows that men prefer blondes as girlfriends or mistresses and brunettes as wives . It seems many men see brunettes as more trustworthy and loyal. What's more, even though participants claimed that blondes are better in bed, they feel brunettes are better kissers and more affectionate than blondes. I find these results to be rather interesting. In my high school and early college days, I actually had a preference for blondes myself -- that is, until I hooked up with my now-wife. From that point on, I deemed brunettes as more attractive and marriage material, probably because they reminded me of and more closely resembled her. I think we can blame Hollywood, shows like Baywatch, and Playboy for painting blondes as wild, big chested, promiscuous and loose. (Yes, I know that there are brunettes in Playboy, but they seem to be in the minority.) When someone tells a man to think of an attractive blonde, who do you think likely crosses his mind? More likely than...