Skip to main content

This fun fact will leave you SHOCKED

How many letters do you handwrite and mail in a year? If you're like most people, the answer is probably zero.

Email, texting, and social media have essentially rendered the practice of writing letters by hand obsolete.

Despite their being old school, a person might still write one when they want to add a personal touch that doesn't carry over digitally  -- say, a child writing to his pen pal, a foreign exchange student reaching out to family from the other side of the world, or a hopeless romantic who wishes to spill his guts via pen and paper.

Can you guess how many letters Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the United States, wrote in his lifetime?

Mind you, there was no Yahoo, Facebook, or Twitter in the 1700s and 1800s. Even the telephone wasn't invented until 1876, and Jefferson died in 1826.

That means people in Jefferson's time had to make do with communicating through correspondence.

And, evidently, Jefferson was nothing short of a pro.

He wrote -- get this -- roughly 19,000 letters in his life!

I'm sure many of us can't say we've written 19 letters in our lives.

If that staggering number doesn't make Jefferson a prodigious writer, I don't know what does.

It makes you think about and appreciate how easy we have it in the modern digital age. Keep in mind that correspondence could take weeks if not months to reach its intended recipient in Jefferson's day. Now, we can communicate with someone thousands of miles away in a matter of seconds.

I can only imagine how much of Jefferson's day was spent scribbling away in his study, writing to everyone from George Washington and John Adams to his friends and relatives.

While the practice may seem archaic today, it's important to remember that these people had no choice if they wished to stay in touch with people who lived far away.

What do you think of Jefferson's remarkable output? When was the last time you composed a letter by hand?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is  still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n...

An important note to women about men and attraction

I was raised by my mom, grandma, and two older sisters.  Growing up, never did I ever take any interest in the girls at school who tended toward exposing more skin. I always treated them as I would my female family members -- with the utmost courtesy and respect.  And anytime I suspected that a male friend or acquaintance of mine adopted a hump-and-dump attitude toward women, I nixed them from my life. I held men who treated women as objects in very low regard, and still do to this day. If women feel empowered to show off their bodies because they love and work hard on their physique, more power to them. In other words, if they're doing it to please THEMSELVES and no one else, good for them.  However, those who do it specifically to curry men's favor are making a big mistake. It sends the wrong signals and actually makes it less likely that a man will want to stick around for a committed relationship (if that's what you want as anyway).  Granted, if you're not lookin...