Skip to main content

Would you work for FREE?

It's an interesting question.

Do you like what you do enough that you would still do it even if you weren't being paid for the work?

I'd venture to say that people in creative professions like writing (yours truly), graphic design, music, acting, and so on would say yes, as would those who work in charitable organizations devoted to a cause about which they're passionate.

On the other hand, people who view their jobs as a mere paycheck are probably less apt to think this way. They're the ones already eying the clock at 4:50 and bolting out the door at 4:59.

I'm one of the lucky few whose favorite hobbies (reading, writing, editing, proofing) coincide with his job responsibilities. I'm a copywriter/editor by day and a freelance writer at night. My true passion, though, is this blog, as it allows me to express myself myself freely -- with no politics or overbearing boss to get in my way.

It isn't so much the work, company, or industry itself that drives people to want to get up in the morning. It's really about how much latitude you have to make decisions. Does the job allow you to propose creative solutions to problems? Is your opinion taken into account?

Unfortunately, most jobs -- especially those at large companies -- require that employees follow the rules and toe the line, causing them operate in rote fashion. This is certainly the case in my day job. My boss -- not to mention her boss -- micromanage all the work that gets put out in my department. I don't have much of a say as far as the words that get put on paper go, so I'm basically a glorified editor and proofreader.

In my case, whether I'm working for McDonald's or the start-up tire shop around the corner, I have a passion for words. I like playing word games and looking up definitions of unfamiliar words in my spare time.

Obviously, I would much rather get paid for my work. But if someone were to ask me to proof or edit something for her as a favor, I would do it -- and probably have fun doing so. I actually did some freelance writing free of charge while still in college, just to gain more writing experience to put on my resume.

Still, some people might enjoy their work but refuse to do it for free. More likely than not, they don't like their trade enough to view it as a hobby, or would much rather be doing other things in their spare tine. (In the case of, say, accountants, social workers, and doctors, I don't blame them!)

So, to reiterate my main point, people are more willing to work for free when:

  • They are truly passionate about their work--they find it fun, mentally challenging, and worth doing even they're off the clock
  • The job allows them creative expression
  • It involves a cause that matters deeply to them
  • They are doing it to gain knowledge or experience for better opportunities
Do you like your job enough that you'd do it for free?


For more posts, click here: How to Understand People

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Women vs. Men: Who likes to backstab more?

Whether it's on TV or in the workplace, the general consensus seems to be that women gossip, backstab, and stir up more conflict than men do. But, as with every other topic, I thought it only fair to put this so-called stereotype under the microscope. If you watch reality shows like Celebrity Apprentice, you'll notice it's the women who spend far more time bickering. While the men do at times become embroiled in tit for tat, it's the women who are portrayed as meaner and more hostile. In the workplace, I have noticed that women seem to gossip far more than their male counterparts. I haven't really seen any cases where a person blatantly backstabs the other, but I have caught both men and women in little white lies. If it is true that women are generally more into backstabbing and gossiping than men, why is this the case? I believe that it isn't fair to make a blanket statement like "all women play these games while all men keep to themselves and pre...

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

Men prefer to marry brunettes

Study after study shows that men prefer blondes as girlfriends or mistresses and brunettes as wives . It seems many men see brunettes as more trustworthy and loyal. What's more, even though participants claimed that blondes are better in bed, they feel brunettes are better kissers and more affectionate than blondes. I find these results to be rather interesting. In my high school and early college days, I actually had a preference for blondes myself -- that is, until I hooked up with my now-wife. From that point on, I deemed brunettes as more attractive and marriage material, probably because they reminded me of and more closely resembled her. I think we can blame Hollywood, shows like Baywatch, and Playboy for painting blondes as wild, big chested, promiscuous and loose. (Yes, I know that there are brunettes in Playboy, but they seem to be in the minority.) When someone tells a man to think of an attractive blonde, who do you think likely crosses his mind? More likely than...