Skip to main content

Are bold and energetic people perceived as more competent?

What's the key reason why Donald Trump mania is sweeping the nation?

For one, the real estate mogul and Republican presidential candidate has a larger-than-life personality. Yes, he's arrogant. Yes, he's bombastic. Yes, he speaks his mind and doesn't apologize for it.

You'd think this would be the recipe for a catastrophic campaign, but Donald Trump is leading in the polls -- and it isn't even close right now.

Why has he had so much success?

People credit him with being the only one with enough bravado to voice what's on his and every other candidate's mind. As an outsider from the world of business, he's appealed to people who are sick of politics getting in the way of progress on Capitol Hill.

It goes without saying that Trump's flamboyance has allowed him to easily overshadow his more sedate opponents. Watching last night's debate, you got the feeling that guys like Rand Paul and Chris Christie strove to show that they, too, could get fired up.

As usual, though, Trump sucked up all the air in the arena and was the star of the show.

I think people who display loads of self-confidence and a virtually limitless level of energy like he does are more likely to be perceived as leaders. They are also deemed more competent.

Though it might very well be that most people who possess these attributes do make great leaders, it isn't always the case. I've seen far too many arrogant and disrespectful people in the workplace end up in cushy VP jobs.

How does this happen? It's quite easy. People mistake their haughtiness for self-confidence. Their willingness to speak their mind is construed as an asset. And they don't care if they get in trouble sometimes -- as long as it means they can get the attention they so relish.

Guys like Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, and Scott Walker seem vanilla by comparison. Many people think that candidates with a laid-back attitude don't have what it takes to stand up to special interests or make the case for much-needed reforms, for example.

But history has shown us that even quiet guys can make great leaders. Look at Warren Buffet and Bill Gates. They prefer to stay away from the limelight and let their work do the talking. Teddy Roosevelt once spoke about speaking softly and carrying big stick. Well, men like these have certainly lived up to that and gone on to become respected, successful businessmen.

People who are quiet and unassuming shouldn't be perceived as weak. They, too, can be one of the great inventors, politicians, or CEOs of tomorrow. Unfortunately, though, not too many people have caught on to that yet.

What are your thoughts?

Please check other posts here How to Understand People.

And here's a related post from earlier today:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Women vs. Men: Who likes to backstab more?

Whether it's on TV or in the workplace, the general consensus seems to be that women gossip, backstab, and stir up more conflict than men do. But, as with every other topic, I thought it only fair to put this so-called stereotype under the microscope. If you watch reality shows like Celebrity Apprentice, you'll notice it's the women who spend far more time bickering. While the men do at times become embroiled in tit for tat, it's the women who are portrayed as meaner and more hostile. In the workplace, I have noticed that women seem to gossip far more than their male counterparts. I haven't really seen any cases where a person blatantly backstabs the other, but I have caught both men and women in little white lies. If it is true that women are generally more into backstabbing and gossiping than men, why is this the case? I believe that it isn't fair to make a blanket statement like "all women play these games while all men keep to themselves and pre...

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

Men prefer to marry brunettes

Study after study shows that men prefer blondes as girlfriends or mistresses and brunettes as wives . It seems many men see brunettes as more trustworthy and loyal. What's more, even though participants claimed that blondes are better in bed, they feel brunettes are better kissers and more affectionate than blondes. I find these results to be rather interesting. In my high school and early college days, I actually had a preference for blondes myself -- that is, until I hooked up with my now-wife. From that point on, I deemed brunettes as more attractive and marriage material, probably because they reminded me of and more closely resembled her. I think we can blame Hollywood, shows like Baywatch, and Playboy for painting blondes as wild, big chested, promiscuous and loose. (Yes, I know that there are brunettes in Playboy, but they seem to be in the minority.) When someone tells a man to think of an attractive blonde, who do you think likely crosses his mind? More likely than...