Travel in person... or with your mind?

What's your preferred way of traveling?

Would you rather travel to places in person, or in your head?

For certain people, the latter seems more up their alley. The reasons for this are varied. It may be that they're:

Afraid of airplanes
Hesistant to deal with the stress that comes from travel
Strapped for cash
Uncomfortable with the thought of being away from home for days in an unfamiliar place
Perfectly content traveling vicariously -- through videos, books, documentaries, and other sources

I think I can be a little of both. It all depends on the mood I'm in.

Sometimes I would rather spend the weekend at home learning about a city -- say, Paris or Honolulu --- via travel books or videos than by actually traveling there.

Every once in a while, though, I do get the itch to venture beyond the comfy confines of my condo and explore museums, mountains, and other attractions that glossy magazine photos don't do justice to.

Some people might argue that you can't fully experience a city or renowned attraction unless you're there in person.

That may be the case, but it also depends on how rich of a mind you have. For example, let's say I'm reading a book or watching a documentary on London. If vivid photos and/or video is accompanied by descriptive, thorough text and/or narration, I might actually feel like I'm in London. The only thing missing is the ability to touch things and take pictures of my own, as well as being able to say, "I was in London."

I understand that for people who want to scratch another destination off their bucket list, there's no room for compromise here.

While there are certainly places I intend on experiencing firsthand, there are others I don't care as much to visit in person, but still wish to learn about. That's when those travel books and videos come in handy.

What's your take on this? Would you rather travel to places in person, with your mind, or both--depending on your mood?

Comments

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it? After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n...

An important note to women about men and attraction

I was raised by my mom, grandma, and two older sisters. Growing up, never did I ever take any interest in the girls at school who tended toward exposing more skin. I always treated them as I would my female family members -- with the utmost courtesy and respect. And anytime I suspected that a male friend or acquaintance of mine adopted a hump-and-dump attitude toward women, I nixed them from my life. I held men who treated women as objects in very low regard, and still do to this day. If women feel empowered to show off their bodies because they love and work hard on their physique, more power to them. In other words, if they're doing it to please THEMSELVES and no one else, good for them. However, those who do it specifically to curry men's favor are making a big mistake. It sends the wrong signals and actually makes it less likely that a man will want to stick around for a committed relationship (if that's what you want as anyway). Granted, if you're not lookin...

How To Understand People

Search This Blog