Skip to main content

Social media are the "chatrooms" of today

It feels like it was yesterday that chatrooms were all the rage. Everyone and his brother seemed to go into chatrooms on what was then America Online (now AOL), Yahoo!, and other sites. On America Online, for example, you could choose from a wide array of chatrooms catering to everyone from those who were "40 and single" to "movie lovers." People really took it to extremes, though. I remember there being a chatroom called "AOL Prom" where kids actually pretended they were at a prom dancing with each other. No joke! Before dating sites like Match.com became popular, many people took to these chatrooms to find love.

I liked going into the city-specific ones, as well as the chatrooms dedicated to sports talk. However, even though a few remain, chatrooms are mostly a thing of the past  (of the late 90s to early 2000s, to be exact). In the world of online chatting, they seem to have been dethroned by social media like Facebook, Twitter, and Google +. Though these platforms don't have chatrooms per se, the manner in which people communicate with each other on, say, Facebook walls, is certainly reminiscent of the chatroom banter many of us engaged in.

I realize, however, that you can't make an apples-to-apples comparison. For example, many people went into certain chatrooms intent on hooking up with someone else. On Facebook, you don't exactly see people saying "I'm 48/male/single, looking for a nice girl who lives in Southern California." Instead, the dialogue mostly revolves around whatever it is that that particular Facebook page is all about -- whether it's your cousin's page or that of your local news station. The way I see it, sites like Facebook are used for two key reasons: (1) to keep in touch with friends and family (2) to receive updates from retailers, news outlets, and other organizations. 

As I alluded to earlier, people interested in meeting others locally will likely turn to sites like match.com and meetup.com. However, social media have taken the place of chatrooms in the eyes of people who want to find someone on the net with whom to discuss the news, sports, or other topics of interest.

To be sure, this is the age of social media, and it doesn't look to be losing steam any time soon. I firmly believe, however, that, like chatrooms, the popularity of social media platforms will eventually begin to wane. In fact, I'm pretty certain social media will give way to something else that is probably in the works as we speak. 

Do you agree that social media serve a similar function as the chatrooms of the late 90s/early 2000s? Were you ever a fan of chatrooms?

To read earlier posts, please click this link: How to Understand People

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is  still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n...

An important note to women about men and attraction

I was raised by my mom, grandma, and two older sisters.  Growing up, never did I ever take any interest in the girls at school who tended toward exposing more skin. I always treated them as I would my female family members -- with the utmost courtesy and respect.  And anytime I suspected that a male friend or acquaintance of mine adopted a hump-and-dump attitude toward women, I nixed them from my life. I held men who treated women as objects in very low regard, and still do to this day. If women feel empowered to show off their bodies because they love and work hard on their physique, more power to them. In other words, if they're doing it to please THEMSELVES and no one else, good for them.  However, those who do it specifically to curry men's favor are making a big mistake. It sends the wrong signals and actually makes it less likely that a man will want to stick around for a committed relationship (if that's what you want as anyway).  Granted, if you're not lookin...