Skip to main content

Looks don't matter -- or do they?

You hear it time and time again: Looks don't matter; it's the inside that counts.

Unfortunately, that's just a bunch of malarkey.

If looks don't matter, why is it that:

  • We flinch at the sight of a "disgusting" rat or roach, but we go gaga over kittens and puppies
  • Employers generally choose better-looking job candidates for positions
  • Studies show that good-looking people are perceived as friendlier and more intelligent than less attractive ones
  • Women spend hundreds if not thousands of dollars each year on plastic surgery, makeup, and other methods of "beautification"
  • Attractive individuals -- including models, athletes, and celebrities -- pervade all kinds of advertisements, including magazine ads and commercials
When something -- or someone -- is pleasing to the eye, we naturally gravitate towards it. Saying that it's the inside that counts is true and certainly noble, but society has become far too shallow to really live by that motto. When pressed for time, as most people nowadays are, we rely on heuristics like pretty eyes and an attractive body to guide us in our decision making. 

You may not know a single thing about either candidate running for office, but the one you deem most attractive, charming, or confident will likely garner your vote. If you have seven average-looking guys and a young-Tom-Cruise-look-alike interested in going out with you, who do you think will come out on top?

Again, I'm not saying things like personality and one's qualifications don't count for anything -- they certainly do. But there's no denying that those armed with good looks have a leg up on the competition.

So the next time you hear someone say looks don't matter, tell them you learned at How to Understand People that they simply don't have their facts straight. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

Women vs. Men: Who likes to backstab more?

Whether it's on TV or in the workplace, the general consensus seems to be that women gossip, backstab, and stir up more conflict than men do. But, as with every other topic, I thought it only fair to put this so-called stereotype under the microscope. If you watch reality shows like Celebrity Apprentice, you'll notice it's the women who spend far more time bickering. While the men do at times become embroiled in tit for tat, it's the women who are portrayed as meaner and more hostile. In the workplace, I have noticed that women seem to gossip far more than their male counterparts. I haven't really seen any cases where a person blatantly backstabs the other, but I have caught both men and women in little white lies. If it is true that women are generally more into backstabbing and gossiping than men, why is this the case? I believe that it isn't fair to make a blanket statement like "all women play these games while all men keep to themselves and pre...

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is  still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n...