Skip to main content

Does success depend on hard work or luck?

Many people say that hard work accounts for one's success while others contend that luck is the single most important contributing factor.

It reminds me of a famous question posed by Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), the 3rd President of the United States and author of the Declaration of Independence:

"Why is it that the harder I try, the more luck I seem to have?"

In other words, another school of thought is that hard work leads to luck, which in turn creates fortuitous circumstances that make success easier to attain.

I am of the opinion that success depends on hard work and luck.

From what I understand, before Justin Bieber became a megastar -- when he was just a regular kid no one knew of -- he would post videos of himself singing on YouTube. The videos garnered heaps of praise, but that still didn't translate into dollar signs.

All it took was for Usher, who is a world-renowned singer in his own right, to take notice of the videos in order for Bieber's life to chance in an instant. Had Usher never come across the videos, Bieber might still be an average Joe like the rest of us.

You have to work hard and be great at what you do, but the right person has to notice. That's why they say that it isn't always about what you know, but who you know. Many people in corporations might feel stifled working under their current supervisor, but remain hopeful that if given the chance to present their work to a higher-up elsewhere in the company, it could be their ticket to a more rewarding job.

That's why being great at what you do, plus having the right contacts in place and making your work visible to them can pay huge dividends.

In a way, I see Jefferson's point, too. For example, the harder I studied for exams in college, the better the grades I got on them -- even if there were questions on the test I stumbled upon and for which I had to venture a guess. It seems the more effort you put in, the more favorable the end result.

What's your take on this? Is success predicated on hard work alone, or does it hinge on luck? Do you think both play a role?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

Women vs. Men: Who likes to backstab more?

Whether it's on TV or in the workplace, the general consensus seems to be that women gossip, backstab, and stir up more conflict than men do. But, as with every other topic, I thought it only fair to put this so-called stereotype under the microscope. If you watch reality shows like Celebrity Apprentice, you'll notice it's the women who spend far more time bickering. While the men do at times become embroiled in tit for tat, it's the women who are portrayed as meaner and more hostile. In the workplace, I have noticed that women seem to gossip far more than their male counterparts. I haven't really seen any cases where a person blatantly backstabs the other, but I have caught both men and women in little white lies. If it is true that women are generally more into backstabbing and gossiping than men, why is this the case? I believe that it isn't fair to make a blanket statement like "all women play these games while all men keep to themselves and pre...

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is  still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n...