Skip to main content

Sunday Scenario: If you were stranded on an island...

This one will require some serious thought, so hold on to your pants, folks:

If you were stranded on an island with no one other than a fairly attractive member of the opposite sex as a result of an unfortunate plane crash and were aware that the chances of you both ever getting off the island were slim to none, do you think you might eventually become physically and emotionally intimate with that person?

The scenario described above is reminiscent of the movie "Cast Away" featuring Tom Hanks, except that in this case the chances of ever making it back home are virtually nil.

I know that this is a tough one, especially for those who have a spouse and children.

Note that we're assuming the following:

  • Friends and family haven't heard from you in a while, and many have assumed you've died
  • You have no access to phones, and there's no way of reaching out to anyone else on the island
  • You and the other person have enough food and water to tide you over for a few years
  • You've found a way to put together a makeshift hut in which you both can sleep
I know most people might say, "If I have a partner and kids, there's no way I would get close to another person." But if you've been stranded on an island for months if not years and there's the possibility you might never leave the island, would it really be that easy for us to resist temptation? 

Since prehistoric times, human beings have needed the care, warmth, and affection of others in order to function properly in society. And let's face it: We all have sexual needs. It's possible that both of you might pledge not to become romantically entangled and remain celibate on the island. But it's only human nature that you begin to develop feelings for someone after spending a long time with him or her, especially if the person has made a solemn effort to look after you. 

So what would you do in this scenario?  Looking forward to reading your responses!

To read earlier entries, click here: How to Understand People



Comments

James Mason said…
I am certain, I would develop a physiological bond to her. Given, all the essentials for that to happen, will be this environment. Great thoughts.

Popular posts from this blog

This will spell the end of your relationship

When asked to think about the most common culprits for a relationship's going south, most people will point to cheating, complacency, and taking one's partner for granted. While these are all valid -- and documented in various posts on this blog -- there are certain habits on the part of partners that may not kill the relationship right away, but cause it to erode more gradually.  Among the most egregious of these is expecting your significant other to be perfect. They pick at your follies any chance they get. Nothing you do is ever good enough. In fact, you will never measure up to an ex, neighbor, or accomplished co-worker.  Perhaps this all sounds a bit familiar.  When you feel as though you're constantly being put under the microscope, it can inflict lasting damage on the relationship and your self-esteem. You're walking on eggshells all the time, praying you don't say or do something that's going to trigger your partner. This is no way to live, let alone ca

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is  still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n

Misconceptions about quiet people

Earlier today, I came across a Facebook page that features motivational quotes intended to improve people's moods and enhance their overall self-esteem. Interestingly, I noticed two quotes that focus specifically on quiet people: "Be afraid of quiet people; they're the ones who actually think." "The quietest people have the loudest minds." I've observed that most people's views of quiet individuals can fall under one of two categories: 1. The ones who say quiet people are antisocial, suspicious, snobbish, and/or full of themselves. 2. The people who say their introspective nature and propensity to be deep in thought makes them smarter than their more garrulous peers. The quotes above speak to this mindset. As an introvert known to be quiet at work and at social functions where I might not know anyone, I feel I'm well positioned to dispel any inaccuracies surrounding quiet folks. First of all, the above statements misguidedly put