Skip to main content

Thinking of your failures? You're more likely to repeat them

It's often been said that people who don't know history are doomed to repeat it. According to new research published in the Journal of Consumer Psychology, though, it appears that being reminded of our failures actually makes us more likely to repeat such behaviors.

Per the researchers, remembering our past mistakes will not necessarily help us make better decisions in the present. In fact, thinking about our failures at self-control -- whether it's blowing a diet, racking up more credit card debt than we intended, or cheating on a partner one or more times -- leads us to repeat them.

For example, thinking about a time when you blew a diet by eating an entire pizza pie by yourself makes you more likely to blow another one in the same way.

Titled "Haunts or Helps From the Past: Understanding the Effect of Recall on Current Self-Control," the study is the first of its kind and was conducted by professors at the University of Pittsburgh and Vanderbilt University.

Among the findings:

  • Participants who recalled ten successes were willing to incur roughly 21% more credit card debt than those who recalled only two successes
  • Participants who recalled two or ten failures were both likely to incur as much credit card debt as those individuals who recalled ten successes
  • When people recall two past successes at self-control (e.g., instances when they resisted spending money on items they didn't need), these instances come to mind easily. It is fairly easy for everyone to think of two such successes. This ease of recall makes people believe that that they are good at self-control -- that they are the kind of person who can resist temptations --- and since people usually want their actions to be in line with their views of themselves, they hold back when confronting tempting situations in the present
  • When participants were asked to recall many successes (ten), they struggled to come up with that many examples. This difficulty led them to assume that they must not be that good at self-control if they cannot come up with the required number of successes and these participants indulged more than those participants who recalled only two successes
  • Participants who recalled self-control failures engaged in equivalent levels of indulgence, whether they recalled few or many such occasions
  • When we're made to think of our failures -- that puts us in a negative mood and research has shown that when people are in a negative mood state, they tend to indulge to make themselves feel better (e.g. drowning their sorrows at the bar)
The research has important implications for companies that strive to assist individuals who suffer from addiction or other issues that result from a lack of self-control, like gambling and obesity. As it turns out, advising them to reflect on times when they failed at self-control so as to maintain it in the present may have the opposite effect. 

Did you find the study interesting?  How good (or bad) are you at maintaining self-control?

Please check out other posts by clicking here: How to Understand People

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This will spell the end of your relationship

When asked to think about the most common culprits for a relationship's going south, most people will point to cheating, complacency, and taking one's partner for granted. While these are all valid -- and documented in various posts on this blog -- there are certain habits on the part of partners that may not kill the relationship right away, but cause it to erode more gradually.  Among the most egregious of these is expecting your significant other to be perfect. They pick at your follies any chance they get. Nothing you do is ever good enough. In fact, you will never measure up to an ex, neighbor, or accomplished co-worker.  Perhaps this all sounds a bit familiar.  When you feel as though you're constantly being put under the microscope, it can inflict lasting damage on the relationship and your self-esteem. You're walking on eggshells all the time, praying you don't say or do something that's going to trigger your partner. This is no way to live, let alone ca

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is  still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n

Misconceptions about quiet people

Earlier today, I came across a Facebook page that features motivational quotes intended to improve people's moods and enhance their overall self-esteem. Interestingly, I noticed two quotes that focus specifically on quiet people: "Be afraid of quiet people; they're the ones who actually think." "The quietest people have the loudest minds." I've observed that most people's views of quiet individuals can fall under one of two categories: 1. The ones who say quiet people are antisocial, suspicious, snobbish, and/or full of themselves. 2. The people who say their introspective nature and propensity to be deep in thought makes them smarter than their more garrulous peers. The quotes above speak to this mindset. As an introvert known to be quiet at work and at social functions where I might not know anyone, I feel I'm well positioned to dispel any inaccuracies surrounding quiet folks. First of all, the above statements misguidedly put