Skip to main content

When trust dies in a relationship

Have you ever been in a relationship devoid of trust? Did it ultimately break down because you simply couldn't confide in your partner?

When trust evaporates in a relationship, it becomes very difficult -- if not impossible -- to restore.

Trust is as integral to a relationship as honesty, love, communication, kindness, and loyalty. 

Trusting the other person is our decision, but it is their choice to value our trust and demonstrate that they're deserving of it.

If you have to play detective in your relationship, then the trust just isn't there.

If you have to second-guess their every move because they keep you on edge all the time, trust is non-existent.

It is at that point that one must do whatever is necessary to build or restore it, or simply call the relationship quits.

Here are just some of the ways trust in a partner can cease to exist:
  • They lie to us. This can take a host of forms (e.g., cheating, feigning their love, etc.) 
  • They steal from us. 
  • They're abusive. 
  • They refuse to seek counseling, whether for relationship problems or drug/addiction issues.
  • Even if they reluctantly agree to counseling, they stick to their old habits.
Without trust, a relationship will eventually crumble. It is no surprise that once a partner's infidelity comes to light, both people face terribly long odds in getting the relationship back on track. 

Not to mention that if one partner steals from or raises their hand against the other, the victim will always fear repeat incidents, no matter how emphatic the offender's apologies. 

Trust is like an eraser: It gets smaller and smaller with every lie or misdeed. 

Trust is the fruit of a relationship in which two people genuinely love, respect, and bring the best out in each other.

There are three things that should never be broken in a relationship: (1) the person's heart (2) promises, and (3) trust. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is  still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n...

Women vs. Men: Who likes to backstab more?

Whether it's on TV or in the workplace, the general consensus seems to be that women gossip, backstab, and stir up more conflict than men do. But, as with every other topic, I thought it only fair to put this so-called stereotype under the microscope. If you watch reality shows like Celebrity Apprentice, you'll notice it's the women who spend far more time bickering. While the men do at times become embroiled in tit for tat, it's the women who are portrayed as meaner and more hostile. In the workplace, I have noticed that women seem to gossip far more than their male counterparts. I haven't really seen any cases where a person blatantly backstabs the other, but I have caught both men and women in little white lies. If it is true that women are generally more into backstabbing and gossiping than men, why is this the case? I believe that it isn't fair to make a blanket statement like "all women play these games while all men keep to themselves and pre...