Skip to main content

Do you agree with this quote?

I came across the following quote on Facebook earlier today:

"Fifteen years ago, the internet was an escape from the real world. Now, the real world is an escape from the internet." 

The quote is attributed to Noah Smith, a professor of finance. What Smith is essentially saying is that we seem to "live" digitally now more than we do the traditional way. It makes perfect sense.

If you're like me, you probably communicate more with friends and family via email, text, WhatsApp, or social media than you do in person. You're likely shopping more online than you do at brick-and-mortar stores. And you're probably watching movies more frequently through services like Netflix than at the movie theater.

While there's no question the convenience the internet affords us has made our lives easier in myriad ways, it's also made human interaction much more impersonal.

If you'd asked me in the 90s whether relatives and friends would someday wish one another Happy Birthday by text message rather than over the phone, I probably wouldn't have believed it. But that's just par for the course in the digital age we live in.

We've become so overly reliant on the internet for almost everything we do that face-to-face interactions have largely taken a back seat. In the late 90s/early 2000s, chatrooms and instant messages were viewed as things people turned to for fun. It was all novel, and no one really expected that virtual communication could ever supplant the real deal.

Fast forward to the present. Thanks to the proliferation of smartphones, tablets, and other devices, you can have a conversation with anyone on the go, at the push of a button. You can exchange pictures, videos, and even have video conversations in real time thanks to products like FaceTime.

I am of the belief that chatting online is no substitute for in-person exchanges with the people you truly care about. Sometimes you want to be able to see, touch, and interact with the individual the conventional way. While digital talk saves us a great deal of time and effort, it also removes that human element that's so vital to social relationships.

It goes without saying we should make an effort to meet up with these individuals at least once in a while. It keeps the relationship fresh and prevents both parties from feeling, for lack of a better word, robotic.

The biggest irony with digital communication is that it can simultaneously make people feel in touch and out of touch.

Doesn't it make you wonder what the future holds as far as communication?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do you have Isolophilia? Find out...

You're probably asking yourself, "What in the world does Isolophilia mean?" It sounds like it would be something negative, doesn't it?  After all, words that end in "philia" (e.g., pedophilia) tend to involve things we want nothing to do with. But Isolophilia isn't something all people deplore. In fact, introverts like me welcome it. Put simply, Isolophilia is defined as having a strong affinity for solitude. It describes a person who relishes being alone. While extroverts can only take so much solitude, we introverts find that it rejuvenates us. In order to recharge our batteries, we need to retreat to a quiet environment where we we're left alone to rest and/or gather our thoughts. Extroverts, on the other hand, become bored and drained when they're alone for a lengthy period of time. Social interaction is the fuel that drives them. So while an extrovert would probably do anything to avoid feelings of Isolophilia in most cases, an...

No response from someone IS a response

Make no mistake about it: When you don't get a response from someone -- whether they fail to answer your texts or return your phone calls -- it is  still a response, and a powerful one at that. When a person fails to respond, it's a direct reflection of their interest -- or lack thereof -- in the relationship. Few things are more aggravating than having to hound a partner, friend, or relative for some sort of reply after we've reached out to them. Yes, we get busy from time to time, but that doesn't give anyone the right to leave the other person hanging. A terse text with something like "Been busy, will reach out soon" doesn't say much, but at least it shows some effort to bring the other person up to speed on why they've fallen off the radar. Failing to provide a response for weeks -- if not months -- communicates that you are just not a priority, and that you'll have to wait your turn to get this individual's attention. This is n...

Women vs. Men: Who likes to backstab more?

Whether it's on TV or in the workplace, the general consensus seems to be that women gossip, backstab, and stir up more conflict than men do. But, as with every other topic, I thought it only fair to put this so-called stereotype under the microscope. If you watch reality shows like Celebrity Apprentice, you'll notice it's the women who spend far more time bickering. While the men do at times become embroiled in tit for tat, it's the women who are portrayed as meaner and more hostile. In the workplace, I have noticed that women seem to gossip far more than their male counterparts. I haven't really seen any cases where a person blatantly backstabs the other, but I have caught both men and women in little white lies. If it is true that women are generally more into backstabbing and gossiping than men, why is this the case? I believe that it isn't fair to make a blanket statement like "all women play these games while all men keep to themselves and pre...